
JOHN T. FLOYD LAW FIRM
Texas Criminal
Lawyer
EXPERIENCED CRIMINAL
DEFENSE LAWYER
TRIALS, SENTENCINGS, AND APPEALS
FEDERAL AND STATE CRIMINAL DEFENSE
"Serious Criminal
Defense Throughout Texas"
Phone (713) 224-0101
E-mail jfloyd@JohnTFloyd.com
Serious Immigration Crimes
Contested Deportation
Hearings
Federal Appeals and Litigation
John T. Floyd III is an experienced attorney who defends
individuals and businesses charged with serious
immigration crimes before all State and Federal courts
throughout the State of Texas. The John T Floyd Law Firm
also represents individuals contesting formal removal or
deportation proceedings.
Prosecutions convictions and sentences for
immigration offenses
According to the Justice Department’s Bureau of
Justice Statistics, the number of people prosecuted for
immigration offenses in federal courts more than tripled
from 1996 through the year 2003, growing from 6,605
defendants in 1996 to 20,771 defendants in 2003.
The number of prosecutions has continued to increase
since 9-11, and is expected to continue this course under
current US policy. The average punishment for individuals
convicted of immigration offenses in 2003 was 21.5 months
in the Bureau of Prisons, followed by continued detention
in U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS)
custody or voluntary deportation.
The number of immigration offenders serving federal
prison sentences increased more than nine-fold between
1985 and 2003– from 1,593 to 14,891 adult men and
women—more than twice the rate of increase for the
entire federal prison population. A major portion of this
growth was attributable to changes in federal sentencing
law that increased the likelihood of a convicted
immigration felony offender receiving a prison sentence,
from 57 percent in 1985 to 81 percent in 2003. The growth
was also the result of increased sentences and time
actually served, which increased from about 4 months in
1985 to 21.5 months in 2003.
Overall, 96 percent of immigration offense defendants
are convicted when prosecuted in the federal
courts.
It is important to note that the people processed
through the federal court system for criminal
prosecutions do not include aliens whom the INS detains
and deports for illegal entry or unlawful residence.
During 2003 alone, federal immigration officers
officially removed 1,073,266 aliens from the U.S.
Roughly, ninety percent accepted an offer of voluntary
deportation, and 10 percent were removed following a
formal hearing.
Offenses and Penalties
Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct
offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v)
prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of
unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized
aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or
aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection
1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring
unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner
whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry.
Subsection 1324(a)(3).
Alien Smuggling: Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)
makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing that a
person is an alien, to bring to or attempts to bring to
the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at
a place other than a designated port of entry or place
other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless
of whether such alien has received prior official
authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United
States and regardless of any future official action which
may be taken with respect to such alien.
Domestic Transporting: Subsection
1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an offense for any person who
-- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an
alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United
States in violation of law, transports, or moves or
attempts to transport or move such alien within the
United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in
furtherance of such violation of law.
Harboring: Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it
an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless
disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered,
or remains in the United States in violation of law,
conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts
to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien
in any place, including any building or any means of
transportation.
Encouraging/Inducing: Subsection
1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who
-- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or
reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless
disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or
residence is or will be in violation of law.
Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting: Subsection
1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage
in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission
of the foregoing offenses.
Bringing Aliens to the United States: Subsection
1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who --
knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an
alien has not received prior authorization to come to,
enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or
attempts to bring to the United States in any manner
whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action
which may later be taken with respect to such
alien.
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30,
1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(3)(A) which
makes it an offense for any person, during any 12-month
period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with
actual knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized
aliens.
Penalties: The basic statutory maximum penalty
for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I)
(alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a fine under title
18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or
both. With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. §
1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation,
harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the
basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5
years, unless the offense was committed for
commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which
case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years.
In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided
for in violations involving serious bodily injury or
placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation
results in the death of any person, the defendant may be
punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of
years.
Hiring Illegal Aliens: Title 8 U.S.C. §
1324a(a)(1)(A) makes it unlawful for any person or other
entity to hire, recruit, or refer for a fee, for
employment in the United States an alien knowing the
alien is an unauthorized alien, as defined in subsection
1324a(h)(3). Subsection 1324a(2) makes it unlawful for
any person or entity, after hiring an alien for
employment, to continue to employ the alien in the United
States knowing the alien is or has become an unauthorized
alien with respect to such employment.
Subsection 1324a(f) provides that any person or entity
that engages in a "pattern or practice" of violations of
subsection (a)(1)(A) or (a)(2) shall be fined not more
than $3000 for each unauthorized alien with respect to
whom such a violation occurs, imprisoned for not more
than six months for the entire pattern or practice, or
both. The legislative history indicates that "a pattern
or practice" of violations is to be given a commonsense
rather than overly technical meaning, and must evidence
regular, repeated and intentional activities, but does
not include isolated, sporadic or accidental acts. In
addition, 18 U.S.C. § 1546(b) makes it a felony
offense to use a false identification document, or misuse
a real one, for the purpose of satisfying the employment
verification provisions in 8 U.S.C. §
1324a(b).
Ilegal entry, marriage or establishing a business for
evading immigration laws: Section 1325 sets forth
criminal offenses relating to (1) improper entry into the
United States by an alien, (2) entry into marriage for
the purpose of evading immigration laws, and (3)
establishing a commercial enterprise for the purpose of
evading immigration laws.
Illegal entry after excluded, deported, or
removed: Subsection 1326(a) now makes it an offense
for any alien who has been denied admission, excluded,
deported, or removed, or has departed the United States
while an order of exclusion, deportation or removal is
outstanding and thereafter enters, attempts to enter, or
is at any time found in the United States, unless such
alien received prior written consent from the Attorney
General.
The basic statutory maximum penalty for reentry
after deportation is a fine under title 18, imprisonment
for not more than 2 years, or both. However, with
regard to an alien whose "removal" was subsequent to a
conviction for commission of three or more misdemeanors
involving drugs, crimes against the person, or both, or a
felony (other than an aggravated felony), the statutory
maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years.
Moreover, if deportation was subsequent to conviction for
an aggravated felony, the statutory maximum term of
imprisonment is 20 years.
Although subsection 1326(a) now refers to any alien who
has been "denied admission, excluded, deported, or
removed, or has departed the United States while an order
of exclusion, deportation, or removal is outstanding,"
subsections 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2), relating to aliens
with prior criminal convictions, refer only to aliens
"whose removal was subsequent to a conviction."
Prohibited sexual activities with aliens: Section
1328 prohibits three kinds of sexual activities with
respect to aliens: (1) importing aliens for prostitution,
(2) holding aliens for prostitution, and (3) keeping,
maintaining, controlling, supporting, employing, or
harboring aliens for prostitution. Each of the three is a
separate crime. See Dalton v. Hunter, 174 F.2d 633 (10th
Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 906 (1949). The phrase, "in
pursuance of such illegal importation," was added to
§ 1328 in 1910 to establish an interstate commerce
nexus because the Supreme Court had held that the statute
infringed on state police powers. See Keller v. United
States, 213 U.S. 138 (1909). Also, "alien" was
substituted for "woman or girl" to make it clear that the
statute applied to both sexes. The phrase, "or for any
other immoral purpose," probably includes only immoral
purposes relating to sex, and not, for example, the
selling of babies. See United States v. Baker, 136 F.
Supp. 546, 549-550 (S.D.N.Y. 1955).
Refusal to Depart: The Illegal Immigration Reform
and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) amended 8
U.S.C. § 1253 to make it a criminal offense for an
alien to willfully fail or refuse to depart from the
United States within 90 days of a final administrative or
judicial order of removal. It is also an offense to
willfully fail to make timely, good faith application for
travel documents necessary for departure, to take action
designed to prevent such alien's departure, or to
willfully fail or refuse to appear for removal. The basic
penalty provision is a fine under title 18, United States
Code, imprisonment for up to 4 years, or both. Enhanced
penalties are applicable to aliens deportable based on
criminal convictions or security related grounds.
Fleeing or evading a checkpoint: The Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
(IIRIRA) added a new 18 U.S.C. § 758, which makes it
an offense to flee or evade a checkpoint operated by the
Immigration and Naturalization Service, or any other
federal law enforcement agency, in a motor vehicle and
thereafter flee from Federal, State, or local law
enforcement agents in excess of the legal speed limit.
Such offense is punishable by a fine under title 18,
imprisonment for not more than five years, or
both.
Marriage Fraud: Marriage fraud has been
prosecuted, inter alia, under 8 U.S.C. § 1325 and 18
U.S.C. § 1546(a). The Immigration Marriage Fraud
Amendments Act of 1986 amended § 1325 by adding
§ 1325(c), which provides a penalty of five years
imprisonment and a $250,000 fine for any "individual
who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of
evading any provision of the immigration laws." Under 8
U.S.C. § 1151(b), "immediate relatives" of U.S.
citizens, including spouses, who are otherwise qualified
for admission as immigrants, must be admitted as such,
without regard to other, ordinary numerical limitations.
The typical fact pattern in marriage fraud cases is that
a U.S. citizen and an alien get married. They fulfill all
state law requirements such as medical tests, licensing,
and a ceremony. But the U.S. citizen is paid to marry the
alien in order to entitle the alien to obtain status as a
permanent resident of the United States; the parties do
not intend to live together as man and wife. A legal
issue arises where the parties tell the INS they are
married, and they subjectively believe they are telling
the truth because they have complied with state marriage
requirements. The Supreme Court has ruled that the
validity of their marriage under state law is immaterial
to the issue of whether they defrauded INS. There have
been situations where a bona fide marriage turns sour but
the alien induces the U.S. citizen spouse to maintain the
marriage as a ruse only as long as necessary for the
alien to obtain status as a permanent resident alien.
There is a line of cases holding that the viability of
the marriage, if initially valid, is not a proper concern
of the INS. United States v. Qaisi, 779 F.2d 346 (6th
Cir. 1985); Dabaghian v. Civilleti, 607 F.2d 868 (9th
Cir. 1979), and cases cited therein. However, the
Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986, 8 U.S.C.
§ 1186a, were designed, inter alia, to eliminate the
Qaisi type loophole by establishing a two-year
conditional status for alien spouses seeking permanent
resident status, and requiring that an actual family unit
still remain in existence at the end of the two year
period.
Passports and Other Entry Documents: Title 18
U.S.C. §§ 1541 to 1546, provide criminal
penalties for offenses related to passports, visas, and
related documents.
A passport is defined at 8 U.S.C. §
1101(a)(30) as "any travel document issued by competent
authority showing the bearer's origin, identity, and
nationality, if any, which is valid for the entry of the
bearer into a foreign country." The Supreme Court has
stated "[a passport] is a document, which, from its
nature and object, is addressed to foreign powers;
purporting only to be a request, that the bearer of it
may pass safely and freely; and is to be considered
rather in the character of a political document, by which
the bearer is recognized, in foreign countries, as an
American citizen; and which, by usage and the law of
nations, is received as evidence of the fact." See Haig
v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280, 292 (1981). Title 8 U.S.C. §
1104 entrusts control of passport and visa matters to the
Department of State, and establishes a Passport Office
and a Visa Office. Title 8 U.S.C. § 1185(b) makes it
unlawful for a United States citizen to attempt to depart
from or enter the United States without a valid passport,
except as authorized by the President. Section 211a of
Title 22 authorizes the Secretary of State to issue
United States passports in foreign countries. Title 22
U.S.C. § 212 limits issuance of United States
passports to United States nationals only. Section 213
prescribes the method of applying for a passport, Title
22 U.S.C. §§. 213, 214a, and 215 control the
fees for passports, 22 U.S.C. § 217a limits the
temporal validity of passports to no more than 10 years.
State Department regulations governing passports appear
at 22 C.F.R. Part 51. See 59A Am.Jur.2d "Passports" for a
general discussion of the law of passports. The
statutory maximum term of imprisonment for violations of
18 U.S.C. §§ 1541 - 1546 is 10 years.
However, 18 U.S.C. § 1547 provides that
notwithstanding any other provision of title 18, the
maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed for
passport and visa violations (except violations under 18
U.S.C. § 1545) if committed to facilitate a drug
trafficking crime is 15 years; and if committed to
facilitate an act of international terrorism is 20
years.
The statute of limitations for violations of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1541 to 1544 is 10 years. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3291.
False Statement in Application for Passport and Use
of a Passport Fraudulently Obtained: Section 1542 of
Title 18 proscribes both false statements made to obtain
a passport, and use of any passport so obtained. The
false statement against which this section is most
commonly used is the use of a false name in obtaining a
passport. United States citizens attempt to obtain
passports using false names in order to conceal criminal
activity. A problem of proof can arise when the passport
applicant has routinely used aliases and now seeks to
obtain a passport in one of those aliases. See, e.g.,
United States v. O'Bryant, 775 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir.1985);
United States v. Cox, 593 F.2d 46 (6th Cir.1979); United
States v. Wasman, 641 F.2d 326 (5th Cir.1981), aff'd, 464
U.S. 932 (1984). Browder v. United States, 312 U.S. 335
(1941), is the leading case on use of a passport, the
application for which contained a false statement.
Browder obtained a passport in his real name, but in the
portion of the application asking when his last passport
was obtained, he falsely stated, "none." This statement
was false because he had previously obtained a passport
in a false name. He then used the new passport to enter
the United States. The Supreme Court upheld Browder's
conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1542 for innocent use
of a passport secured by a false statement. See 53
A.L.R.Fed. 507.
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) amended this statute to
provide for enhanced penalties if the offense was
committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism
or a drug trafficking crime.
Making or Using a Forged Passport: Section 1543
of Title 18 proscribes the forgery, alteration, etc., of
passports or the use of or furnishing to another of a
forged, altered, void, etc., passport or purported
passport. It applies to instruments issued or purportedly
issued by foreign governments as well as by the United
States. See United States v. Dangdee, 616 F.2d 1118 (9th
Cir. 1980).
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) amended this statute to
provide for enhanced penalties if the offense was
committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism
or a drug trafficking crime.
Fraud and Misuse of Visas, Permits, and Related
Documents, and False Personation: The first paragraph
of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) proscribes the forging,
counterfeiting, altering or falsely making of certain
immigration documents or their use, possession, or
receipt. The second paragraph proscribes the possession,
or bringing into the United States of plates or
distinctive papers used for the printing of entry
documents. The third paragraph makes it a crime, when
applying for an entry document or admission into the
United States, to personate another or appear under a
false name. The fourth paragraph makes it a crime to give
a false statement under oath in any document required by
the immigration laws or regulations.
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) amended subsection 1546(a) to
provide for enhanced penalties if the offense was
committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism
or a drug trafficking crime.
Subsection 1546(b) makes it a felony offense to use a
false identification document, or misuses a real one, for
the purpose of satisfying the employment verification
provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(b).
Offenses relating to nationality and citizenship:
These offenses include misuse of citizenship papers, 18
U.S.C. § 1423, impersonation or misuse of papers in
a naturalization proceeding, 18 U.S.C. § 1424,
unlawful procurement of citizenship, 18 U.S.C. §
1425, falsification of naturalization papers, 18 U.S.C.
§ 1426, and unlawful sale of citizenship papers, 18
U.S.C. § 1427.
The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) added 18 U.S.C. §§
1425, 1426, and 1427 as RICO predicate offenses, as well
as authorizing wiretap authority for investigations of
such offenses.
The IIRIRA also added a new 18 U.S.C. § 1015(e)
which makes it a felony offense to make a false claim of
citizenship to obtain federal or state benefits, and a
new subsection 1015(f), which makes it a felony offense
to make a false claim of citizenship in order to register
to vote in any federal or state election. Moreover, the
IIRIRA also added a new 18 U.S.C. § 611 which makes
it an offense, punishable by imprisonment for up to one
year in prison, for an alien to vote in a federal
election.
| Item | Value |
| % of referrals prosecuted | 90.2 |
| rank: % of referrals prosecuted | 41 |
| % of referrals declined | 9.8 |
| rank: % of referrals declined | 49 |
| # prosecuted | 3,622 |
| # of referrals with prosecution declined | 393 |
| # referrals acted upon | 4,015 |
Federal Judicial District = Texas, S
| Item | Value |
| % convicted after referral | 75.7 |
| district rank: % of referrals convicted | 49 |
| % convicted after prosecution | 84.2 |
| district rank: % prosecutions convicted | 77 |
| # of referrals disposed of | 3,884 |
| # prosecutions completed | 3,491 |
| # convicted after prosecution | 2,940 |
Federal Judicial District = Texas, S
| Item | Value |
| % prison after referral | 68.2 |
| district rank: % referrals with prison | 32 |
| % prison after conviction | 90.0 |
| district rank: % convictions with prison | 40 |
| # of referrals disposed of | 3,884 |
| # convicted after prosecution | 2,940 |
| # sentenced to prison terms | 2,647 |
Federal Judicial District = Texas, S
| Item | Value |
| median prison term (months) | 15.0 |
| rank: median prison sentence | 56 |
| average prison sentence (months) | 22.0 |
| rank: average prison sentence | 60 |
| median probation sentence (months) | 0.0 |
| average probation sentence (months) | 1.5 |
| median fine received | $0 |
| average fine received | $2,123 |
| # convicted after prosecution | 2,940 |
| # sentenced to prison terms | 2,647 |
Immigration Criminal Referrals Acted Upon: Prosecuted versus Declined 2003
Federal Judicial District = U.S.
| Item | Value |
| % of referrals prosecuted | 89.1 |
| rank: % of referrals prosecuted | - |
| % of referrals declined | 10.9 |
| rank: % of referrals declined | - |
| # prosecuted | 20,771 |
| # of referrals with prosecution declined | 2,529 |
| # referrals acted upon | 23,300 |
Federal Judicial District = U.S.
| Item | Value |
| % convicted after referral | 80.6 |
| district rank: % of referrals convicted | - |
| % convicted after prosecution | 90.7 |
| district rank: % prosecutions convicted | - |
| # of referrals disposed of | 22,717 |
| # prosecutions completed | 20,188 |
| # convicted after prosecution | 18,316 |
Federal Judicial District = U.S.
| Item | Value |
| % prison after referral | 65.6 |
| district rank: % referrals with prison | - |
| % prison after conviction | 81.3 |
| district rank: % convictions with prison | - |
| # of referrals disposed of | 22,717 |
| # convicted after prosecution | 18,316 |
| # sentenced to prison terms | 14,891 |
Federal Judicial District = U.S.
| Item | Value |
| median prison term (months) | 15.0 |
| rank: median prison sentence | - |
| average prison sentence (months) | 21.5 |
| rank: average prison sentence | - |
| median probation sentence (months) | 0.0 |
| average probation sentence (months) | 3.4 |
| median fine received | $0 |
| average fine received | $1,319 |
| # convicted after prosecution | 18,316 |
| # sentenced to prison terms | 14,891 |
[ Back to top ]
